True Friends and False Dichotomies

It’s the start of the year. Traditionally a time when people gathered around the fire, wrapped themselves up warmly and shared online self-help tips with each other, possibly accompanied by pictures of inspirational kittens hanging off things. 

I don’t want to undermine this noble activity, but I can’t help noticing that a lot of self-help advice is not actually that useful. Being inspirational is all very well, but being told, for example, “stop worrying” and “stop blaming other people for your problems” and “you can’t love others till you love yourself” is getting a bit grating. In the entire history of spoken language, the phrase “stop worrying” has never decreased anyone’s levels of worry. And what if other people actually are to blame for your problems? And it’s demonstrably true that you can, in fact, love others without loving yourself. People manage it all the time. 

But the one that’s particularly annoying me is actually two pieces of advice in conjunction. I won’t name the site I saw it on, because it’s not fair – it’s well-intentioned, and you can find the same advice all over the internet. But this is the quote:

“Stop spending time with the wrong people. Life is too short to spend time with people who suck the happiness out of you. …  And remember, it’s not the people that stand by your side when you’re at your best, but the ones who stand beside you when you’re at your worst that are your true friends.”

Let’s look at a practical example of what this advice entails. Let’s say Ai and Bee are friends. However, Bee has become clingy and depressed and is draining Ai’s energy, so Ai drops Bee as a friend. 

That’s what happened from Ai’s point of view. From Bee’s point of view, Ai failed the test of true friendship by not standing by her when Bee was “at her worst”.  Who’s right? 

What I’m trying to say is that the two pieces of advice above can easily lead to double standards. Dump people who drag you down, but only be friends with people who won’t do that to you? Is that fair?

The trouble is, it’s when people are at their worst that they suck other people’s happiness. And it’s probably because they’re suffering from depression or loss or rejection themselves. The problem of what to do about that is a real one, both for them and for their friends, but I don’t think it should be solved by dividing one’s friends into ‘people I will dump if they get too needy’ and ‘people I will stand by at all costs.’

And to continue to look at this in practical terms, how do you tell someone they’re too depressing to be friends with any more? Email? Text? Skywriting? A personalised message in a stick of rock? The etiquette is far from clear.

And when does the tipping point come? The 1am phone call when they cry at you over the infidelity of their partner or the loss of their mother or their boss’s insensivity? Is that a great time to mention that they’re getting a bit draining and could they stop talking to you?

I agree that sometimes you do have to focus on looking after yourself first, and I can see that standing by people could be seen as one of the criteria for ‘true friendship’ – but I’d like more detail on what standing by someone involves in reality. What if they’ve killed someone? Do you have to take their side in every argument (and what if you have another friend on the other side?) Can you still hang out with their ex? Loyalty is not a simple concept. And nor is friendship. 

Share

4 comments

  1. Karl James says:

    I so agree Kate. Apart from being a selfish piece of advice, walking away from those who drain you is also a lazy one. Helping people by allowing them to talk about what’s worrying them can often dissolve, lessen or at least change their perspective on the world. So it can help them and guess what, you get something out of it too. There can be a rich and deep sense of satisfaction when you’ve ‘been there’ for someone. Does it take energy? Yes. Can it ‘drag you down’? Sometimes. For a while. But if you can bring a sense of proportion, perspective and health to the conversation, it can also be a small catalyst for change. Thanks for the post.

  2. Giles says:

    I agree.

    Caring for people close to you who you love isn’t too difficult. Caring for people close to you who you find difficult to love is a test of character.

    And although it isn’t always possible, failing to care will often make someone feel worse about themself. That’s why we sometimes see tired, depressed, even heartbroken people, who we might think have better things to do, giving their time to caring for someone who doesn’t appear to appreciate the care given them, and re-affirming their own worth through this selflessness.

    Now, I’m not saying that this is an ideal situation, but removing a person’s primary source of affirmation won’t help them. Instead they should receive both your appreciation, and (if possible) the appreciation they deserve from the object of their attentions.

  3. The Goldfish says:

    I’ve always taken this advice to refer to people who don’t much value you anyway, not those who are merely hard work. Everyone has their crises and if we ditched every friend who ever became hard work, we wouldn’t have any (after one friend’s death, another friend getting suddenly dangerously ill and needing a leg amputating and a series of health scares among the rest of my social circle, I once swore that I would give everyone I met a full medical in advance of us becoming friends, but that didn’t really work out).

    However, I have let go of friends who *only* use me as a sounding board for their problems and are nowhere to be seen when I’m in trouble. But that’s after establishing a long term pattern and it’s definitely a gentle letting-go as opposed to a formal dumping.

    Evelyn Waugh said that if he had to choose between betraying his country and betraying his friends, he hoped he would betray his country. I don’t think that answers any of your questions, but it seemed worth throwing in. ;-)

  4. Lee says:

    I thought that I was the only one who saw and felt something wrong about the quote. I know it means well, and the entire paragraph it came with is actually confusing, because the first sentence seems to somewhat contradict the succeeding sentences. I am at the other end of the spectrum, the dumped friend…dumped for being continuously in a depressed state, but I was also the one who stood by them selflessly when they were the one in the dumps. My thoughts would probably be biased because of this, but it’s just crazy to encourage this quote, while well meaning, it’s quite a double edged sword.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.